Content
The content of medical knowledge in this section of the site of the Lactology Foundation is intended for the practical needs of doctors, pharmacists and students in these specialties. It is more than reasonable to consult other authoritative medical sources before using our medical knowledge.
- Lung in Health and Disease
- General Approach to Patients
With Respiratory Disorders - Evaluating Lung Structure and Function
- Interstitial Lung Diseases
- Pulmonary Vascular Diseases
- Disorders of the Pleura,
Mediastinum, and Chest Wall - Respiratory Failure
- Lung Transplantation
- Perioperative Pulmonary Management
- COVID-19 Pulmonary Management
- Congenital Lung Malformations
- Sleep-Related Disorders
Approach to wheezing in children
Wheezing is a common presenting symptom of respiratory disease in children
A nationwide survey performed in the United
States between 1988 and 1994 showed that the
prevalence of wheezing among two to three year
olds was 26 percent and among 9 to 11 year olds
was 13 percent. One in three children experience
at least one acute wheezing illness before the
age of three years. Wheezing may be either a
benign, self-limited process or the presenting
symptom of a significant respiratory disease.
The role of the treating clinician is to try to
reach the most likely diagnosis as quickly and
efficiently as possible so that therapy, if
necessary, can be instituted and the parental
concerns can be addressed.
The most likely
diagnosis in children with recurrent wheezing is
asthma, regardless of the age of onset, evidence
of atopic disease, precipitating causes, or
frequency of wheezing. However, other diseases
can present with wheezing in childhood, and
patients with asthma may not wheeze. The
differential diagnosis of wheezing includes a
variety of congenital and acquired conditions.
Clinical history and physical examination often
allow accurate diagnosis. However, radiographic
examination, pulmonary function testing,
bronchoscopy, sweat chloride concentration, and
selective laboratory studies are helpful tools
in establishing the underlying etiology of
wheezing when used appropriately. The initial
evaluation of a wheezing child is directed
towards the exclusion of alternative diagnoses,
followed by a therapeutic trial of
bronchodilators if asthma is suspected.
A
diagnostic approach to wheezing in childhood is
presented in this topic review.
DEFINITION AND PHYSIOLOGY OF WHEEZING
A
wheeze is a continuous musical sound heard
during chest auscultation that lasts longer than
250 msec. It is produced by the oscillation of
opposing walls of an airway narrowed almost to
the point of closure. It can be high pitched or
low pitched, consist of single or multiple
notes, and occur during inspiration or
expiration. Wheezes can originate from airways
of any size throughout the proximal conducting
airways. Wheezing requires sufficient airflow to
generate airway oscillation and produce sound in
addition to narrowing or compression of the
airway. Thus, the absence of wheezing in a
patient who presents with acute asthma may be an
ominous finding, suggesting impending
respiratory failure.
Wheezing caused by a
large or central airway obstruction has a
constant acoustical character throughout the
lung but varies in loudness depending upon the
distance from the site of obstruction. It is
referred to as monophonic (or homophonous)
wheezing. In contrast, the degree of narrowing
varies from place to place within the lung in
the setting of small airway obstruction. As a
result, the sounds generated also vary in
quality and acoustical character and are
described as polyphonic (or heterophonous)
wheezes.
Some experts distinguish between
wheezes and rhonchi based on the dominant
frequency, or pitch, of the sound. Wheezes have
a dominant frequency greater than 400 Hz,
whereas rhonchi are of lower frequency. However,
the clinical significance of this distinction,
if any, is not well defined.
Stridor refers
to a monophonic sound that is loudest over the
anterior neck. Stridor can be heard during
inspiration, expiration, or throughout the
respiratory cycle, depending on the location and
severity of obstruction. In general, inspiratory
stridor is prominent in the setting of
extrathoracic obstruction, whereas expiratory
stridor suggests intrathoracic obstruction.
CLINICAL HISTORY
When a patient presents
with a history of wheezing, it is crucial to ask
the patient or the parents to describe what they
are actually experiencing or hearing. On many
occasions, the word "wheezing" is used as a
general term to describe noisy breathing,
including snoring, congestion, rattling,
gurgling noises, or stridor. It is essential to
try to validate the symptom of wheezing if
parental report is the only source of
information and no wheezing is heard on
examination of the child.
There are few
studies that compare parent-reported respiratory
illness in infants with clinical diagnosis. In
another study, parental report of wheezing in
139 infants and children was compared with
clinical findings of wheezing and diagnosis of
asthma. There was a less than 50 percent
agreement between a clinician's finding of
wheeze and asthma and parents' report of wheeze.
Fourteen percent of parents use the term
"wheeze" to describe other noises, mainly upper
airway noises.
Two important aspects of the
medical history include the patient's age at the
onset of wheezing and the course of onset (acute
versus gradual).
Acute onset of wheezing
raises the possibility of foreign body
aspiration, particularly if there is a history
of choking. In addition, it is helpful to
distinguish between intermittent and persistent
wheezing. Persistent wheezing presenting very
early in life suggests a congenital or
structural abnormality. In contrast, paroxysmal
or intermittent wheezing is a characteristic
finding in patients with asthma.
Persistent
wheezing with sudden onset is consistent with
foreign body aspiration, whereas the slowly
progressive onset of wheezing may be a sign of
extraluminal bronchial compression by a growing
mass or lymph node. Less frequently, patients
with interstitial lung disease can present with
persistent wheezing.
Cough is a symptom
commonly associated with wheezing. The nature of
the associated cough (wet versus dry) may be
helpful in determining the underlying etiology.
Wet cough typically results from excessive mucus
production, mostly due to infection or
inflammation (eg, bronchiectasis, cystic
fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, asthma,
and chronic aspiration). In contrast, pure
bronchoconstriction or structural causes for
airway narrowing (eg, asthma, airway malacia or
compression, foreign body, vascular ring) are
usually associated with a dry cough. However,
the underlying etiology of a dry cough can be
complicated by a secondary process, making this
distinction difficult (eg, mechanical
obstruction can lead to impaired mucus clearance
resulting in infection and a wet cough).
Among children younger than two years of age,
the incidence of wheezing with respiratory
illnesses is approximately 30 percent and peaks
between two and six months. Typically, these
infants present with classic coryzal symptoms
that progress to coughing, wheezing, and,
occasionally, respiratory distress over a period
of three to five days; resolution is gradual
over approximately two weeks. These episodes are
variably responsive to bronchodilators and
systemic glucocorticoids but not antibiotics,
expectorants, or antihistamines. A symptom-free
period typically follows, followed by recurrent
wheezing with subsequent viral illnesses in as
many as 50 percent of babies.
Features in the history that favor the
diagnosis of asthma include:
●Intermittent
episodes of wheezing that usually are the result
of a common trigger (ie, upper respiratory
infections, weather changes, exercise, or
allergens)
●Seasonal variation
●Family
history of asthma and/or atopy
●Good response
to asthma medications
●Positive asthma
predictive index
Clinical features that
suggest a diagnosis other than asthma include
the following:
●Poor response to asthma
medications.
A history of neonatal or
perinatal respiratory problems and wheezing
since birth suggests a congenital abnormality.
●Wheezing associated with feeding or vomiting
can result from gastroesophageal reflux or
impaired swallowing complicated by aspiration.
●A history of choking, especially with
associated coughing or shortness of breath,
suggests foreign body aspiration, even if it
does not immediately precede the onset of
wheezing symptoms.
●Wheezing with little
cough suggests a purely mechanical cause of
obstruction, such as small airways, airway
malacia, and vascular ring, since cough is a
prominent component of asthma in children.
●Symptoms that vary with changes in position may
be caused by tracheomalacia, bronchomalacia, or
vascular rings.
●Poor weight gain and
recurrent ear or sinus infections suggest cystic
fibrosis, immunodeficiency, or ciliary
dysfunction.
●History of progressive dyspnea,
tachypnea, exercise intolerance, and failure to
thrive suggest interstitial lung disease.
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
General examination
of a wheezy child should include measurement of
weight and height, vital signs including oxygen
saturation, and digital inspection for the
presence of cyanosis or clubbing. The latter
findings suggest the presence of a wheezing
illness other than asthma.
Chest examination
should focus on the following features:
Inspection for the presence of respiratory
distress, tachypnea, retractions, or structural
abnormalities. Pertinent findings include an
increased anteroposterior (AP) diameter
associated with chronic hyperinflation, pectus
excavatum caused by chronic airway obstruction
and exaggerated swings in intrathoracic
pressure, or scoliosis complicated by airway
compression.
●Palpation to detect
supratracheal lymphadenopathy or tracheal
deviation.
●Percussion can define the
position of the diaphragm and detect differences
in resonance among lung regions and is the most
underperformed part of the examination.
●Auscultation allows identification of the
characteristics and location of wheezing, as
well as variations in air entry among different
lung regions. A prolonged expiratory phase
suggests airway narrowing. Wheezing caused by a
large or central airway obstruction (eg,
vascular ring, subglottic stenosis,
tracheomalacia) has a constant acoustic
character throughout the lung but varies in
loudness depending upon the distance from the
site of obstruction. In contrast, the degree of
narrowing varies from place to place within the
lung in the setting of small airway obstruction
(eg, asthma, cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary
dyskinesia, aspiration). The presence of focal
wheezing is usually indicative of a localized
and mostly structural airway abnormality, and,
therefore, airway evaluation by imaging or
bronchoscopy is warranted.
●Crackles can be
present in conjunction with wheezing in asthma
and in a variety of other conditions, such as
those leading to bronchiectasis (eg, cystic
fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, immune
deficiency). Early inspiratory crackles are
often present in patients with asthma due to air
flowing through secretions or slightly closed
airways during inspiration. Late inspiratory
crackles are usually associated with
interstitial lung disease and early congestive
heart failure. Thus, the presence of crackles
does not exclude the diagnosis of asthma.
●Decreased wheezing after bronchodilator therapy
is suggestive of asthma but does not rule
comorbid conditions if clinically suspected.
The remainder of the examination should focus on
cardiac findings, including murmurs and signs of
heart failure. Examination of the skin for
eczema (common in atopic patients) or other
cutaneous lesions may assist in diagnosis. Nasal
examination may reveal signs of allergic
rhinitis, sinusitis, or nasal polyps. The
presence of nasal polyps in children
necessitates an evaluation for cystic fibrosis.
RADIOGRAPHY
A chest radiograph
(anteroposterior [AP] and lateral films) should
be considered in children with new-onset
wheezing of undetermined etiology or chronic
persistent wheezing not responding to therapies.
It is not necessary to obtain a chest radiograph
with every exacerbation in children with asthma,
unless there is a specific indication.
In
most cases, a plain chest radiograph provides a
good image of the large airways, including the
tracheal air column and mainstem bronchi. Plain
films can also help differentiate between
diffuse and focal disease. The presence of
generalized hyperinflation suggests diffuse air
trapping and airway disease, seen in asthma,
cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, and
aspiration. In contrast, localized findings
suggest structural abnormalities or foreign body
aspiration. A chest radiograph can also detect
parenchymal lung disease, atelectasis, and in
some cases, areas of bronchiectasis.
In
addition, chest radiographs may reveal
cardiomegaly, enlarged pulmonary vessels,
pulmonary edema, or other signs of cardiac
failure. Plain radiographs are also helpful in
detecting mediastinal masses or enlarged lymph
nodes and may suggest the presence of vascular
rings (eg, right aortic arch).
Other
radiologic studies may be helpful in selected
cases. Chest computed tomography (CT) can
provide detailed anatomy of the mediastinum,
large airways, and lung parenchyma. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast (magnetic
resonance angiography [MRA]) or multidetector
computed tomography (MDCT) should be considered
when a vascular problem is suspected.
Barium
swallow may help in identifying vascular rings,
swallowing dysfunction, aspiration syndromes
including gastroesophageal reflux, and some
cases of tracheoesophageal fistula; however,
this study is indicated only when these
conditions are suspected.
PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS
Pulmonary
function tests (PFTs) are an important component
of the diagnostic evaluation of a wheezy child.
Infant pulmonary function testing, if available,
is helpful in assessing airway obstruction.
Moreover, this test can be used to quantify the
response to bronchodilators. Airway resistance
and functional residual capacity can also be
measured using gas dilution or body
plethysmography and can help quantify airway
obstruction and the response to bronchodilators.
In older children who are cooperative, pulmonary
function testing with inspiratory and expiratory
flow-volume loops is helpful in determining the
presence, degree, and location of airway
obstruction, as well as the response to
bronchodilators. Methacholine challenge testing
and exercise testing can confirm airway
hyperreactivity in patients for whom the
diagnosis of asthma is still in question.
RESPONSE TO TREATMENT
For patients with
diffuse wheezing, a trial of inhaled
bronchodilators can be used to confirm the
presence of reversible airway disease. However,
a partial or negative response may not rule out
asthma. Inflammation and airway swelling may
contribute to wheezing, in addition to
bronchoconstriction, especially in infants and
young children. Thus, if asthma is still
suspected in a patient with chronic or
persistent symptoms, the combination of inhaled
glucocorticoids and bronchodilators for at least
two weeks (or five to seven days of oral
glucocorticoids if the patient has more severe
symptoms) may result in significant improvement
in symptoms and help in making the diagnosis of
asthma. Further work-up is indicated if the
response to this therapy is inadequate or if a
comorbid condition is still suspected in a
patient who had a positive response to
bronchodilator.
LABORATORY STUDIES
There are few
laboratory investigations that are useful in the
initial evaluation of the wheezy child. In most
cases, the probable diagnosis is suspected on
the basis of the clinical history and physical
examination. The role of laboratory tests, when
indicated, is either to confirm the diagnosis or
to rule out other less likely diagnoses.
Complete blood counts are important in patients
with chronic or systemic symptoms and may reveal
anemia, leukocytosis, or leukopenia.
Eosinophilia in this setting supports an
underlying allergic process or possible
parasitic infection. Further studies should be
obtained based on the suspected diagnosis.
Testing for infection — Viral infection is an
important cause of wheezing in children and is
mediated through numerous mechanisms. The
interrelationship of viral infection, wheezing,
and the development of asthma in children is
complex and changes according to the patient's
age, the presence of atopy, and environmental
factors.
Viruses in the Paramyxoviridae
family (eg, respiratory syncytial virus and
parainfluenza virus) and picornavirus family
(eg, human rhinovirus) are important
precipitants of wheezing in young children.
Metapneumovirus, another member of the
Paramyxoviridae family, is a newly recognized
human pathogen that can result in upper and
lower respiratory tract infection and may
present with wheezing. Thus, viral studies can
be helpful in confirming the etiology of
wheezing in young children presenting with
symptoms suggestive of bronchiolitis. However,
they are not routinely recommended. Sputum stain
and cultures may be useful in a setting
suggestive of bacterial infections, including
atypical infections (eg, mycobacterial or fungal
infections), that can result in wheezing.
Tuberculin skin testing and specific serologic
assays can be helpful if these infections are
suspected. Serologic testing for Mycoplasma may
be considered if such an infection is suspected
since Mycoplasma is an increasingly recognized
cause of wheezing and may predispose children to
the subsequent development of asthma.
Sweat chloride test — The sweat chloride test
allows clinicians to assess physiological
changes associated with cystic fibrosis and is
indicated in children with chronic lung
problems, including wheezing. It is expected
that the majority of patients with cystic
fibrosis will be diagnosed at birth due to
newborn screening for cystic fibrosis. However,
false negatives can occur. Thus, obtaining a
sweat test is appropriate if clinical suspicion
of the disease remains.
The presence of
diarrhea, failure to thrive, and/or clubbing
should raise the suspicion for cystic fibrosis
and warrant further evaluation. One should also
have a low threshold to obtain this test in a
patient with persistent or recurrent pulmonary
symptoms that are unresponsive to asthma
therapies, especially when wheezing is
associated with a chronic productive cough,
since identifying a patient with cystic fibrosis
has major implications for the patient, the
family, and future reproductive decisions. The
sweat chloride test should be undertaken at a
facility with substantial experience, and
clinicians interpreting the results should be
aware of other conditions that result in
elevated sweat chloride concentrations.
Other
studies — Immunoglobulin levels can be used to
screen for immunodeficiencies. Elevated
immunoglobulin E (IgE) can be indicative of an
allergic process. If there is a high suspicion
of immunodeficiency, then a more detailed
immunological work-up is appropriate.
ENDOSCOPY
Endoscopy is a diagnostic tool
used in patients with suspected foreign body
aspiration, persistent symptoms, or inadequate
response to therapy. Rigid bronchoscopy is used
in patients with sudden onset of wheezing and
suspected foreign body aspiration. Flexible
bronchoscopy performed under conscious sedation
is used to evaluate the airways during
spontaneous breathing and to exclude
tracheomalacia. Nasopharyngoscopy, which allows
visualization of the vocal cords and larynx
without lower airway endoscopy, is a less
invasive alternative in infants and children
with evidence of extrathoracic obstruction. This
approach provided a diagnosis in 75 of 82 cases
(91 percent) in one series, without evidence of
lower airway disease during a mean follow-up
interval of six years. Bronchoscopy with
bronchoalveolar lavage should be obtained if
infection, aspiration, or interstitial lung
disease is suspected.
Please see also our Toxilact data base which is in the following language versions:
Toxilact Deutsche Sprachversion
Toxilact Nederlandstalige versie
Toxilakt έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα
Toxilact English language version
Toxilact magyar nyelvű változat
Toxilact versione in lingua italiana
Toxilact polska wersja językowa
Pulmonary symptoms, findings and investigations
Assessment of chronic cough
Expectoration
Hemoptysis
Pleural Effusion
Approach to wheezing in children
Polysomnography
Pulmonary Function Testing
Toxicological risk during lactation
Toxicological lactation category I - the drug and/or its metabolites are either not eliminated through breast milk or are not toxic to the newborn and cannot lead to the development of absolutely any toxic reactions and adverse consequences for his health in the near and long term. Breast-feeding does not need to be discontinued while taking a given drug that falls into this toxicological lactation category.
Toxicological lactation category II - the drug and its metabolites are also eliminated through breast milk, but the plasma:milk ratio is very low and/or the excreted amounts cannot generate toxic reactions in the newborn due to various reasons, including degradation of the drug in the acid pool of the stomach of the newborn. Breastfeeding does not need to be discontinued while taking this medicine.
Toxicological lactation category III - the drug and/or its metabolites generate in breast milk equal to plasma concentrations or higher, and therefore the possible development of toxic reactions in the newborn can be expected. Breastfeeding should be discontinued for the period corresponding to the complete elimination of the drug or its metabolites from the mother's plasma.
Toxicological lactation category IV - the drug and/or its metabolites generate a plasma:milk ratio of 1:1 or higher and/or have a highly toxic profile for both the mother and the newborn, therefore their administration is incompatible with breastfeeding and it should to stop completely, and not just for the period of taking the drug, or to look for a less toxic therapeutic alternative.